Wednesday, August 29, 2012

COMM 303 Blog #1


Farewell Old Friend…

Communication technology is such a necessity to many in this society, including myself.  I do consider all the new media to be important and maybe to some extent necessary for the time we all find ourselves living in. However, I am not the type of person that goes and gets in line to shop for the newest invention from Apple. I do not own an I-phone and do not plan to own one any time soon. My reasons for not complying with the “trend” are for my rebellious ways to not conform to the “cool ways” of all the “cool kids.” Don’t get me wrong, the majority of my friends own I-phones, and I love them all the same, I just don’t like to be the same as everyone else. So to be honest, I am not a communication technology junkie or part of the “trend.”

                Being that I am no seeker of adventurous new technology, I do not know how I would have approached the introduction of the radio to individuals’ homes. In a way I feel like because there wouldn’t have been such an inundation of new technologies I probably would have accepted it with more ease. Radio reached 40% of all households in the U.S. by 1930, and it passed 90% by 1947 (Grant and Meadows, 22). Today it still remains as the number one household medium. So much so that radio is in 99% of houses in the U.S. (Nielsen, Jan. 2011).

                Radio is obviously in almost every U.S. residence, however, is it really valued and appreciated anymore? That is a question that all individuals should take time to answer. In my honest opinion, it is not cherished to the extent it used to be. In a way, this makes me melancholic. As I am sure it does as well to many that delight in the pleasures of broadcasting played through the airways of frequency and amplitude.

                In the “olden days” radio was THE way of entertainment for American families. Grandparents, parents and children would all gather around to listen to the radio, being either the factual information provided by the news or even the stories told by Orson Welles, which affected the public to the point of panic with the broadcasting of The War of the Worlds. To this day the broadcasting of the fictional end of the world remains the most popular of all time.

                What I call traditional radio, both AM and FM have become ways to transmit contemporary music and commentary shows of rude-obnoxious-wannabe “political critics.” The exception being the broadcasting of NPR, which is probably still the best way to obtain real news today.

                The modernization of radio now makes it hard to define what radio really is anymore. Traditionally I’d suppose you’d expect to have some sort of tuning box transmitting signals of shows in AM or FM, as well as the in between blank spaces filled with white noise. But that’s not the case anymore, radio has evolved so much that it’s on the internet, phones and other portable devices. It has spread and not all is necessarily strictly AM or FM anymore. There also exists the HD version of radio, satellite radio, internet radio, Pandora and now there is even radio frequencies provided from 3000 miles away, like I-Heart Radio, which lets you choose from country wide radio stations to customize your preferences of broadcasting.

                Communication technology advances every day at the speed of sound. It is so fast that if radio, the traditional version, is not valued or appreciated, it will vanish into being mere memories of sounds we once heard. In the future if radio cannot find the means to compete with all these “new radios,” there is no doubt that it will disappear. Especially since the new media is asynchronous, and the internet gives us the option to listen to the broadcastings whenever we want to. There’s an element that will be lost in radio, being “live” is never going to happen again with our new attitudes of, “I’ll listen to it when I want.”

                It’s in our hands to either bid farewell to traditional/live radio, or to simply guard it. Those annoying commercials cannot be that bad as to the point of getting rid of an entertainer that has always been there, don’t you think?

No comments:

Post a Comment